Sunday 25 March 2012

WHU blog: Squeaky bum time...

After over a month without blogging about West Ham United, I find myself writing about a football team who have drawn their last 5 games and after my last West Ham post, they were in 1st place, 6 points above Reading. They're now 4 points behind them, so what's changed?

Well to be honest, nothing much has changed.

There have only been injures to 3 important players - Reid, Vaz Te and Faubert, but the two latter players happen to be two of the most creative players at the club. However, the available players can't blame injures for drawing 6 games out of 7 since the match away to Blackpool. That amount of draws simply isn't acceptable for a team chasing automatic promotion, however if 3 of those 6 games had been wins we could be 2 points in front of Reading with a game in hand.

However, as usual with West Ham it hasn't gone to plan this season, but why is this?

Many fans are blaming the manager's long ball style. This is only part of the problem, the main issue is the formation. Sam Allardyce usually sets up the team in a 4-5-1 formation, with Carlton Cole on his own up front. He's a good striker but can't be expected to keep scoring goals with no one alongside him.

I feel that if the style and formation aren't changed soon, we could find ourselves in the play off places come the end of the season and we'll only get promoted automatically if we win all of our remaining games, including the one against Reading at Upton Park, which I can't see us winning at the moment.

How does Sam Allardyce turn things around? Like this:

SHORT TACTICS LESSON!

I've never been a fan of one player up front (in any formation) because it encourages the other 10 players to play the long ball. I like the 4-4-2 because it offers a lot of versatility, however not many top teams play this way anymore. A formation being used a lot is the 4-1-3-2 and this would suit West Ham perfectly, because the team (with all players fit) would probably be set up like this:


As you can see, this formation would give support to Carlton Cole and bring two different types of striker together. Kevin Nolan could do what he does best and sit just behind the strikers, with Faubert and Vaz Te on the wings putting crosses in for Cole to knock down to Maynard to SCORE A GOAL, which is something we have struggled to do when on level terms.

But what do I know about football? I'm only a 19 year old university student.

TB 2012

Wednesday 21 March 2012

Public Affairs/Politics - Sessions 2 and 3.

I'm catching up on some Politics blogging, so here are my notes from sessions 2 and 3.

Session 2 - introduction and other stuff

Recap of Local govt.

The 3 levels of local government are: County Council, District/City Council and Parish Council. The county and city councils in an area have no power over one another, they are on par. They are sometimes called a Unitary Authority (esp. in smaller cities).


National Politics (in the context of journalism)

John Wilkes was a 'hero journalist'. He had a colourful life and was an MP as well as the Mayor of London at one point. He wrote a paper called The North Briton in which he attacked Lord Brute and King George III. His work went a long way to enabling journalists to have free speech, he did this by reporting the events of Parliament and used the protection of the city.

From this, the idea of 'Fair Comment' was developed. This allows journalists to write pretty much what the like as long as it is their honest opinion, however writing about their personal life isn't allowed to be published and journalists get into serious bother and a telling off from Sir Cameron if they do.

Westminster

The rules of privilege mean that you can report anything said in the House. Just don't talk about the Royal family though, the Queen might just have you beheaded if you do write 'bad stuff' about them.

House of Lords

All new laws have to be approved by both Houses of Parliament (except for tax raising measures, these are decided by MPs alone).

How are laws made?

A law starts off as a 'green paper' (this is an idea/proposal also called a bill) and then becomes a 'white paper' if it turns into a law. Below are the steps needed to make a green paper turn white:

First reading - an official notice that a bill is going to be proposed.
Second reading - the principles are considered.
Committee stage - groups of MPs discuss the bill and its individual parts.
Report stage
Third reading - the bill is debated (usually at great length!)
House of Lords - the bill is then passed onto the HoL.
Consideration of amendments
Royal assent - Queenie signs it off.


Session 3 - focusing on party politics since the 19th century.

19th century

Rotten Boroughs

Areas like Manchester and Liverpool were known as 'Rotten Boroughs' and became industrial centres with huge population changes.

Reform Act 1832

A shift of representation towards the towns and the north, instead of the country being completely London-centric. The Corn Laws were repealed and the rivalry between Conservative vs. Liberal parties developed with Robert Peel and William Gladstone.

After World War 1

Socialism and the rise of the Labour Party in the 1920s. There was a resurgence of Conservative politics in the depression years.

After WW2

In 1945, there was the first proper Labour government after Churchill surprisingly lost the election. Many social reforms wereut in place e.g. NHS and Trade Union rights). The British Empire was dismantled and India got independence.

1970s

The General Strike was a disaster for Labour (also known as the 'Winter of Discontent')

1980s
Margaret Thatcher came into power in 1979, there was a 'big bang' in world markets and Maggie sold off regulations imposed by Labour. The 'Square Mile' became a very rich place and the housing market boomed and rose by 30% at one point and a broom cupboard in West London was sold for more than £30,000. There was also a rise in class warfare and a clash between the left and right.

John Major and Tory 'sleeze time'

This time was a boom-time for tabloid newspapers. Jonathan Aitken was a Tory MP who wanted to use a 'sword of truth' to get rid of 'bent and twisted journalism'. He was convicted of perjury in 1999.

The rise of 'New Labour'

When Tony Blair came into power, he wanted to get rid of the notion that Labour were a socialist party and the name created visions of the 'Winter of Discontent'.


TB 2012.

Wednesday 14 March 2012

HCJ2: Max Weber and Bureaucracy.

Weber was one of the 4 skeptics - Marx, Nietzsche, Weber and Freud (known for ideas on ideology, power, morality and irrationality respectively).

After Karl Marx, there were no revolutions (although the Paris Commune came close) and militarism and imperialism took hold in many countries, mainly because of antisemitism and general xenophobia. In Germany, Bismarck put a lot of the German speaking nations into one state by enforcing rules and laws upon them. This new state needed bureaucracy because of the efficiency needed to run it, this probably explains why Germany has always had a reputation for doing things efficiently. This new bureaucracy created a middle class and in turn, bourgeoisie values spread downwards.

Weber looked at why we obey authority figures and those in power and he found 4 types of social actions:

1: Instrumental-rational (an action carried out  we want to do)
2: Value-rational (an action carried out because it is good practice)
3: Affectual-emotional (an action carried out for an emotional reason)
4: Traditional (an action carried out because society has always done it)

Weber also looked at the types of authority figures we follow:

1: Traditional (people we have always followed and/or respected e.g. parents)
2: Charismatic (people we follow because of their style e.g. religious cult leaders)
3: Legal-rational (people who are supposedly above us e.g. politicians and judges)

The two main problems of legal-rational authority are militarism and cultural exhaustion. Militarism is all about a state seeking enemies just to justify the state's own bureaucratic nature and to create a sense of national danger just to seem important (take America as an example).  Cultural exhaustion is about over-analysing of religion and because bureaucracy advocates total equal rights, therefore stopping artistic geniuses from developing.


According to Weber, bureaucracy has led humanity to lose the skills we used to have e.g. architecture and music. People in bureaucratic societies are are just a very small cog inside an extremely large wheel. We can't get away from bureaucracy, we live and die in a bureaucratic world, this includes hospitals and schools.

TB 2012

Tuesday 6 March 2012

HCJ Seminar Paper. Nationalism and the Jews.

From one country to another, from one religion to another and from one culture to another, lifestyles and philosophies have been extremely different, but there is one thing all of the people in the world had in common. They all at one point or another, had individuals and groups in their populations who did not like Jews. But why have people hated the Jews? There have been a mixture of economic, political and religious factors. To even try and understand why people have hated the Jews, we must look at who the Jewish people are.

The Jews belong to a race that has been inferior throughout history. Since the eighteenth century, men have been classified in defined groups and categories for example working class, middle class and upper class but the most prominent classification of people has been skin colour. However, there is no race that has two original ancestors without any mixture of other races because strictly speaking, there is no such things a race. This means that the sorting of man has no value, unfortunately it has been dominant for mankind, largely due to people’s ignorance.

At first, the white race was divided into the Aryan race and the Semite race, the Aryans were considered to be the perfect race. We are indebted to them for religious and philosophical ideas and writing as well as great works of art, the Aryan race has also proved its superiority by resisting the Semites. This is a race which hasn’t really produced any artwork, but its religious and moral work has benefited man greatly. History shows Aryan vs. Semite conflict for example the Median Wars between the Greeks and Persians, with the Greeks being the Aryans and the Persians being the Semitic race. Although conflict has taken place between the two races, Aryans and Semites have shared civilisations and both have each other’s blood.

Anti-Semites admit that there are superior and inferior Semites, with the Jews being inferior. The Jews have adapted to the different places they have lived in and as a result they haven’t really remained the united group that they used to be, there are great varieties in the Jewish people, for example there are black Jews. This is basically why the grievances of anti-Semites have no foundation and also why the opposition between the Aryans and Semites is artificial.
 
The biggest hate campaign against the Jewish people came in 1894. The Dreyfus Affair divided the left and right politically minded people in France, the country was so militaristic and were worried about another war with Germany. The army was largely Anti-Semitic at the time as well. The Dreyfus Affair started because secret French military information was found in the Germany embassy, an army general Dreyfus was found guilty of giving information to the Germans and his conviction was largely based on the fact that he was a Jew. Even after Emile Zola wrote J’Accuse, the French army decided to keep Dreyfus on the Devil’s Island to avoid their own embarrassment.

Now on to the topic on nationalism and the Jewish people. To understand nationalism in the context of the Jews, we must define what a ‘nation’ actually is. A nation is generally considered to be a group of individuals who share a common territory, language, law and customs. However, it could be argued that there is no such thing as a race that shares the same origin, because there is not one country where all people are of the same the blood and spirit. However, according to Bernard Lazare, nations do exist, these may not share a common government or share their fatherland, but the nation continues as long as the consciousness of that community and its thought and interests have not disappeared, then that nation still exists.

Many would argue that there is no such thing as a Jewish race, but that the Jews are part of the nations that they currently live in. It would be easy to assume that because Jewish people are scattered around the world, mixing with many different people, that they would simply disappear. However, 3 things have stopped this: the first one is that their religion keeps them together, it acts like a glue that bonds all Jewish people, no matter where they are. The second cause is the social conditions that they are responsible for and the third is the social conditions they are not responsible for, therefore the conditions placed upon them by others.

The Jewish religion puts ethics and metaphysics together, along with being a ‘law’. To become part of the Jewish ‘nation’, you had to accept God, also called Yahweh as well as God’s laws. It has been said that without the laws, Yahweh may have disappeared into everyone who had received him. However, the Jews preserved God by following his law, also called Torah and after the fall of Jerusalem, the Torah held Israel together. Even when Jewish people spread themselves around the world, they still view the world in the same way. This also applies to the literature and philosophy that they read and follow. Jews also had similar living conditions, similar customs and were subject to the same moral laws. Many would argue that this is enough for the Jews to be called a ‘nation’ because nations have the same customs and laws, as do the Jews.

However, this cohesion may have led to the anti-semitism that they have experienced. Due to them surviving many struggles, they have considered themselves the ‘elect people’ and superior to all others. This is shown in an article written by Rabbi Manis Friedman, who says that “a Jew is a unique creation, so the soul of a Jew is inherently and basically different than the soul of a non-Jew”. However, he goes on to say that Jews can’t explain why they are ‘different’.

History may give us some clues to why Jewish people have been hated so much throughout history. At Rome, Jewish people were not subject to the municipal laws and weren’t required to appear in court on Saturday, which is their Sabbath. The Jews had in fact created a nation within a nation and had their own government and their own ruler, Jewish people were also exempt from paying taxes and eventually rose to a position higher than other people in the communities that they lived in, this led to them attracting jealousy and hatred from the people of the municipalities that the Jews were living in.

It has been argued that Jewish people gained their wealth at this time at the expense of Christians, through deception and oppression. Bernard Lazare calls it “the moral charge of the anti-Semites”, he also says that “the Jew is more dishonest than the Christian”.

However, there could be some reason behind this apparent dishonesty and exploitation of Christians. Young Jews are taught from the Talmud, which is a collection of Jewish laws and rules. Any deviation from these laws results in being shunned from the Jewish community, but Jews tried to get around these laws and the punishments with cunning, therefore it could be argued that the Jews have developed a sly nature, this is certainly implied in Lazare’s writing.

We have seen that all throughout history, the Jews have been hated, but the answer to why this is will probably remain an answered question, however some factors could include people’s ignorance and maybe even the Jews’ religion and customs.

Friday 2 March 2012

Radio bulletin assessment

My finished radio bulletin assessment, happy listening!

RADIO ASSESSMENT by Thomas Baxter

Radio assessment stories


Story 1

There are plans for a new school to be opened in Winchester.

If given the go-ahead, the school will be situated on the site of The Westgate School and would become the first county-run combined primary and secondary school in Hampshire.


Story 2

Ten local charities in Winchester are set to benefit from Active Community Project Grants from the city council, including Winchester Action on Climate Change.

Giles Gooding, who from the charity says that working with residents is the key to lowering the city’s carbon emissions.


Story 3

An independent study of residents and visitors of Winchester has concluded this month.

Research experts Tourism South East were commissioned to gather people’s views on the town’s markets. The survey found that 73% of people asked disagreed that the town became unpleasantly overcrowded as a result of the markets.

However, some Winchester residents do not agree with the views gathered in the study.


Story 4

A man awaiting trial for the murders of his landlady and her mother has been found hanged in prison.

Barry Morrow was on remand in Her Majesty’s Prison Manchester for the murders of Angela Holgate, 54 and Alice Huyton, 75. Mr Morrow was found hanged on Thursday afternoon.

Thursday 1 March 2012

HCJ2 - The Dreyfus Affair and J'Accuse.

First of all, I'll go into some of the background to the Dreyfus Affair.

The Franco-Prussian war

Growing power and influence of Prussia under Bismarck and the attempts to unify Germany. Napoleon III was captured at Sedan in 1871 (after very stupidly starting a war without any allies!)

The French had to pay compensation to the Germans for the war that the French lost and that the Germans actually led the French into! France also had to give up the region Alsace Lorraine. The French people then took over Paris but were surrounded by Germans.

Paris Commune

During the time of the Parisian people taking over their fine city, there was communist-like state. Lenin called it 'the festival of the oppressed' and like all festivals, it didn't last very long.

The Commune contained a mixture of 'Jacobins', anarchists, socialists and far left activists. Women were important in the PC and some important ideas e.g. women should have the vote, nurseries and that there should be better working conditions.

The PC was destroyed and 20,000 - 30,000 were executed and although it was short lived, it had huge impact on politics.


The Dreyfus Affair

The army was fragile in France and needed a victory after being humiliated by the Germans.

The Dreyfus Affair started because evidence of miltary information was found in a bin in the German embassy. The army implicated Captain Dreyfus - an intelligent man from Alsace (the region that the Germans took from the French). The French army held a secret court martial and found Dreyfus guilty of treason, he was then sent to the prison on 'Devil's Island'.

The evidence was looked at later on and a man called Esterhazy was tried but found not guilty.

Dreyfus was tried for a second time and was found guilty again although there was no evidence, however there were 'extenuating circumstances'. He was released after a pardon, but his release was kept quiet and Dreyfus even fought in WW1.

Dreyfus was involved in a group called Action Francoise, a far right group who were arguably worse han the Nazis. Ironically, Dreyfus' granddaughter was killed in Auschwitz.

French journalist Emile Zola got involved and wrote 'J'Accuse' - an open letter detailing why Dreyfus was innocent and how the whole thing was just a conspiracy and accuses  Major du Paty de Clam of basically setting up Dreyfus. Of course, this lands Zola in a heap of poo and he is convicted of libel and sentenced to prison, however he flees to London.

Anti-Jewish riots took place all over France and right wing newspapers had a field day and call for all Jewish people to lose their citizenship.


TB 2012

Mr Warner CCRC case - my decision

Mr Warner's original appeal provides some basis to doubt that he murdered Mr Pool and murdered and raped Mrs Pool, for example there was no blood found on Warner's clothes or other belongings and there was no blood in the sink or drain of his caravan. There was also no forensic evidence to suggest that Warner had actually been upstairs at the Pool's home. Also, a serial rapist 'The Vampire' was roaming free at the time of the murders and rape and he could have been in the Easthampton area at the time. However, Warner's appeal was dismissed because the evidence against him was 'formidable'.

One suspect that had been considered at the time was Mr Rodgers (The Vampire), although he was arrested in February 1990 for a series of rapes, there is no evidence to suggest that he murdered Mr Pool and murdered and raped Mrs Pool, except for six unidentified fingerprints. These fingerprints were not attributed to anyone.

The lawyers of Warner sent a letter to Easthampton Police regarding certain items of evidence (saliva from Mrs Pool's breast, 2 duvets, a swab from the inside of a kitchen drawer, a blood swab from outside the house and a swab from the handle of the knife), but almost all of this evidence had been destroyed. However, fibres from Warner's jumper and fibres from items found upstairs hadn't been destroyed, but these were indistinguishable from each other when forensically examined.

Another piece of evidence that is useful to the investigation is the DNA recovered from Mrs Pool and after DNA profiling tests, a scientist determined that there was an incomplete profile of Warner, but according to a forensic scientist, the chance of finding someone unrelated to Warner that committed the crime is 1 in 680 and I believe this should be considered as key evidence to the case.

Another couple of key points should be raised, Warner had lied in his statement, throwing in to question his innocence. It was unclear where Warner's actually was at the time of the murder, his caravan mate Mr Knox said that Warner was back at 2.45am, this ties in with the time of the murders and contradicts Warner's claim that he was back at 1am.

One piece of evidence that wasn't found was a murder weapon, but the nearest evidence in the house to suggest that Warner committed the crime is the fingerprints found in the kitchen

My final conclusion is that the conviction of Warner is safe. This is because of the evidence against him. A DNA profile of Warner was found on Mrs Pool, although the profile was incomplete, there is a low chance of the crime being committed by anyone else. Another key piece of evidence is that Warner took a shirt believed to have been kept upstairs in the Pool's home, this contradicts Warner who said that he didn't go upstairs. Finally Warner's behaviour is suspicious, especially that he washed his jeans the day after the crime was committed, this suggests that he wanted to cover up the crime.