My editor/senior journalist interview is with the Editor-in-Chief of TopGear magazine, but due to BBC rules I am unable to publish the video to the public.
I am waiting on permission to publish my confessional interview to the public from the subject of it - a former pathological gambler who after losing £1.3 million over nearly ten years, turned his life around when he stopped gambling and set up his own problem gambling consultancy business.
Sunday, 11 May 2014
Innovation in the magazine industry: Technological innovations in magazines, with focus on TopGear Magazine.
‘Print is dead’ was a phrase uttered only a couple of years ago when online versions of magazines began to gain popularity and it was feared that technological innovations could be about to change magazines forever.
The availability of computers, smartphones and tablet
computers has made the online versions of magazines just as easy to access as
the print copies. It seems as if the days of waiting for the new edition of a
magazine to go on sale are over for some readers, as a magazine’s content is
now only a few clicks of a mouse or touches of a screen away.
The content that magazines release online isn’t just easier
to access; it is also more up-to-date than in the print copies. In the latest
edition of TopGear Magazine, the main feature focused on Ferrari’s brand new
high performance car, called ‘LaFerrari’, but the headline piece on the website
changes on a regular basis, sometimes reflecting what is in the new edition of
the print magazine, but more often than not, the headline piece on the website
is the latest feature produced by the team or a review of a new car. This
doesn’t just show how behind the times print magazines are, but all of print
media.
If a magazine has a website that is regularly updated, then
it could be argued that the printed version is out of date almost as soon as it
goes on sale. Articles that appeared in the printed magazine and on the website
can be updated and/or reworked, with writers and editors able to add new
information and photos, but this new content can obviously only be added to the
website. An example of this comes from TopGear. The May edition of the magazine
has a feature on ‘LaFerrari’, but the website has a different version of the
feature. The feature in the magazine details the reviewer’s experience of
driving the car, as well as giving the reader important information about it,
but the article on the website is far more basic and information about the car
in the print magazine article is spread across a few separate pages of the site
as well as a more interactive look at it. The website also had a feature on a
new version of the car, called ‘LaFerrari XX’, but there was nothing in the
magazine about it.
Although technological innovations have somewhat taken over
the magazine industry and have allowed for a surge in popularity of online
versions of magazines, it wasn’t long ago that the print magazine industry was
experiencing an innovation of its own, as Charlie Turner, Editor-In-Chief of
TopGear Magazine, explains, “When I started, the last photo-shoot we could do
would tend to be about a week before our deadline because you had to process
the film, then you had to edit it, then you had to scan it, then you had to lay
it out, then you had to send it off for high-res scanning, then you had to get
it back, the process took forever. These days we’re shooting, we shoot stuff
occasionally on deadline day so we can be in the middle of nowhere, take
pictures of a car, send it back to the office, design it and send it to the
printers, the speed has totally changed, so in terms of innovation, magazine
industry has changed fundamentally in the last five, 10 years with the sort of
birth of digital photography, but beyond that the utilisation of the content
that you are generating, so you’re looking at assets, whether it be photography
or writing being delivered across a platform”.
It is the utilisation of content that Turner mentions that
will surely be of the utmost importance to the magazine industry in the next
few years. The content produced for the print version of a magazine is just as
important for the online version as the technology that allows it to exist.
It could be argued that the popularity of smartphones has
also changed the way that magazines are now read. A replica version of the latest
edition of TopGear Magazine is available to download on smartphones at the same
time as the printed version goes on sale. This shows a clear cross-platform
strategy being used by TopGear, with content being published in the magazine,
on the website and on smartphones.
Charlie Turner describes how smartphones are changing the
industry, “I think mobile is going to be clearly the way that people consume
media will drive the innovation in the business and if you look at the way
magazines are produced, they are incredibly old school, they are printed on
presses that have been there 60 years, on huge great reams of paper, we are
getting much better at the sustainability, if you look at the way that people
globally consuming media, the internet, mobile consumption are all going
through the roof, so interesting and interactive ways of delivering content on
mobile is going to be fundamental”.
He also explains how TopGear Magazine has adjusted to the
demand for content to be available on smartphones, “Most people have a
smartphone in the UK, there’s a huge proportion of smartphones in the UK and
therefore that’s how people are grazing content and coming up with a way of
making them engaged with that content in a meaningful way or just give them
something to distract them from the daily grind is what we’re sort of looking
at and different ways of delivering our content”.
He adds, “We’ve got a back catalogue of the most amazing
photography of cars ever, so how we deliver that into that market and apps are
going to be really fundamental to how we do that and just different ways of
engaging with that audience, but it’ll be really interesting”.
It is not just smartphones that have changed the magazine
industry in the last couple of years, but also the rise in popularity of tablet
computers. Figures from CCS Insight show that for users of tablet computers,
60% of web browsing takes place on their tablet devices. A 2013 YouGov report
into Media, Technology and Telecoms said that by the end of 2014, almost half of
UK households will own a tablet computer.
While this may not be good news for print magazines, it does
open up a whole new market for the magazine industry as a whole, as Charlie
Turner explains, “The tablets are going to be huge there’s no two ways about that,
where you, how you publish on a tablet”.
He adds, “What we tend to do is the magazine is the magazine
but then in the tablet it’s much more interactive so it’s got more video
content, more sound files. There is motion and there’s sort of emotion of
seeing them in action and all of those things and that’s where it’s getting
really interesting and that’s sort of interactivity is fundamental to what
we’re doing”.
This new interactive content is contained within the
magazine’s digital edition - an iPad app that allows users to buy individual
issues for £2.99 and a yearly subscription for £24.99, which represents a
significant saving compared to buying individual issues of the print magazine
or on a subscription.
It is not just TopGear Magazine that has exploited the popularity
of tablets computers. Future Publishing, the team behind Total Film and Official
Xbox 360 Magazine, reported sales figures on all of their digital editions of
$1 billion a week. Despite high sales, 2013 figures show that only 21.8% of the
circulation of Total Film came from its digital edition. The printed magazine may
not be as dead as first thought.
Everything has to evolve at some point and the same goes for
the magazine industry. Publishers have realised that for their magazines to be
successful, they have to be in a different form that just print and it seems as
if the more platforms a magazine publishes content on, the more successful it
will be. TopGear Magazine is just one of many that has moved into a new phase -
embracing new technology and is using it to its full potential despite the
market conditions. Editor-in-Chief, Charlie Turner: “I think it’s really easy
for people to get quite down on magazines, because inherently in the UK, it’s a
tough market, but the reality is that what that’s done is opened up so many
more opportunities in the whole sort of publishing sphere that it’s actually a
really exciting time to be involved in.”
So it seems that if the magazine industry wants to survive,
it will need to tap into new technology, literally.
Sunday, 27 April 2014
QPR 1-1 Millwall - 26th April 2014
It was ironic in the end that after so much hard work and
determination from the Millwall players that it was a former West Ham player
who made the mistake that gave the Lions a point at Queens Park Rangers.
Ian Holloway on the decision to award
QPR a penalty: “I think handball
should be deliberate. It might have hit his hand but was it in the box and was
it deliberate?
“If there hadn't been a whistle, not one person behind that goal would have jumped up looking for a penalty - and I know this ground pretty well. I can't believe what I saw.
“I've had the benefit of watching it six or seven times, but even when watching it in real speed I thought it was harsh.”
QPR manager Harry Redknapp: “When you're 1-0 up in the last minute you expect to see the game out.
“It's difficult to balance a team and maybe we had too many players who are good when they have the ball and not so good when they haven't got it.
“When we didn't have possession we didn't close down as well as I would have liked. It's about finding that balance and a happy medium and that's what we've got to do for the play-offs.
“Millwall played well. They've got bags of enthusiasm and have had some great away results recently, so they've been in good form.”
On the penalty decision: “I haven't seen the replay, but everyone who has seen it says it was a penalty.”
I was at the match whilst on placement at The Sunday Times and attended it with legendary journalist Brian Glanville.
Due to their lowly league position, it was a game that
Millwall could not afford to lose, but they wasted early chances. Quality was at
a premium for most of the game and neither side looked like taking control.
QPR - who are already assured of a play-off place - rested
some of their key players, namely striker Kevin Doyle and winger Junior Hoilett
and it showed as the players who started the match were unable to get past Millwall
goalkeeper David Forde for most of the game.
The home side were sluggish for most of the first half, but
sprung into life after the break. Joey Barton, Tom Carroll and Ravel Morrison
all went close. Barton hit a shot wide of the right-hand post and both Morrison
and Carroll fired over the bar.
It was QPR’s top scorer, Charlie Austin, who provided a
moment of quality though. Simeon Jackson was adjudged to have handled Hoilett’s
cross just inside the area and Austin slotted in the spot kick for his 17th
goal of the season.
The competitive performance from Millwall showed why they
deserve to be in the Championship next season, but also highlighted that they
need to strengthen in attack, as Stefan Maierhofer and Scott Malone both wasted
good chances.
In the end, their persistence paid off as Malone’s scuffed
shot was misjudged by QPR keeper Green and the ball went spinning into the back
of the net to extend Millwall’s unbeaten run to seven.
“If there hadn't been a whistle, not one person behind that goal would have jumped up looking for a penalty - and I know this ground pretty well. I can't believe what I saw.
“I've had the benefit of watching it six or seven times, but even when watching it in real speed I thought it was harsh.”
QPR manager Harry Redknapp: “When you're 1-0 up in the last minute you expect to see the game out.
“It's difficult to balance a team and maybe we had too many players who are good when they have the ball and not so good when they haven't got it.
“When we didn't have possession we didn't close down as well as I would have liked. It's about finding that balance and a happy medium and that's what we've got to do for the play-offs.
“Millwall played well. They've got bags of enthusiasm and have had some great away results recently, so they've been in good form.”
On the penalty decision: “I haven't seen the replay, but everyone who has seen it says it was a penalty.”
I was at the match whilst on placement at The Sunday Times and attended it with legendary journalist Brian Glanville.
Friday, 4 April 2014
Media Law Year Three - Lecture Seven. Press Regulation.
Journalists must follow regulations, which affect both print and broadcast journalists.
The Press Complaints Commission (PCC) is the regulator for newspapers, magazines and other written publications. It is seen as something of a 'toothless tiger' because its code of practice was established by the newspapers themselves.
At the moment, there seems to be a tussle between the press and the government, with the former wanting their own regulator, whilst the latter wants a royal charter and statutory regulations. If put in place, it will mean stricter controls on the written press, something that the industry does not want.
Ofcom is the regulatory authority that policies broadcast media, it covers everything on TV and radio.
Broadcasters must have a licence from Ofcom to transmit and can have their licence taken away if they commit offences serious enough for Ofcom to do so. It can also impose a fine of up to 5% of a broadcasters revenue if is rules have been broken. BBC and S4C (Welsh-language public service television) do not hold Ofcom licences, but are still subject to its rules and can be fined.
These sanctions will be imposed when "a broadcaster deliberately, seriously, or repeatedly breaches the code...".
BBC Editorial Guidelines are for BBC staff and set the standards for the journalism of the corporation.
The BBC handles all its own complaints about inaccuracy and bias and the BBC Trust sets out the framework for its procedure.
NUJ Code of Conduct is only a guide to good conduct, therefore cannot impose serious sanctions.
Abiding by this code can be important for maintaining the reputation of a journalist or a publication. A journalist or a publication may break the code and be lowered in the eyes of their fellow journalists, people they want to interview and/or the public.
The Press Complaints Commission (PCC) is the regulator for newspapers, magazines and other written publications. It is seen as something of a 'toothless tiger' because its code of practice was established by the newspapers themselves.
At the moment, there seems to be a tussle between the press and the government, with the former wanting their own regulator, whilst the latter wants a royal charter and statutory regulations. If put in place, it will mean stricter controls on the written press, something that the industry does not want.
Ofcom is the regulatory authority that policies broadcast media, it covers everything on TV and radio.
Broadcasters must have a licence from Ofcom to transmit and can have their licence taken away if they commit offences serious enough for Ofcom to do so. It can also impose a fine of up to 5% of a broadcasters revenue if is rules have been broken. BBC and S4C (Welsh-language public service television) do not hold Ofcom licences, but are still subject to its rules and can be fined.
These sanctions will be imposed when "a broadcaster deliberately, seriously, or repeatedly breaches the code...".
BBC Editorial Guidelines are for BBC staff and set the standards for the journalism of the corporation.
The BBC handles all its own complaints about inaccuracy and bias and the BBC Trust sets out the framework for its procedure.
NUJ Code of Conduct is only a guide to good conduct, therefore cannot impose serious sanctions.
Abiding by this code can be important for maintaining the reputation of a journalist or a publication. A journalist or a publication may break the code and be lowered in the eyes of their fellow journalists, people they want to interview and/or the public.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)